筆夾: `W+-0F@Y?@
原裝是engraved而復刻版是stamped的分別。 :NWIUN
原裝是雕刻的, .5s58Hcg,
要「深」得多。 x`C"Z7t
式樣而言, AhA&=l
i;
倒是相同。 ?0KIM*
.
有老外筆評有以下「投訴」: /({oN1X>i
「The clip is engraved on the original pen. On this replica it is 'stamped.' This means that although the design is the same, the engraving has a much fainter appearance and seems out of balance with the rest of the pen. It is nowhere near as well done as the Toledo engraving and it is a shame that Pelikan decided to take this route. It almost feels like I could smooth off the engraving with my thumb. 」 yFmy
竟使用了shame這個要很小心使用的字眼。 BxV>s+o&]
個人也對比過: %B#T"=Cx
是比較「淺」了一點, (n>Gi;u(R
但不是如他所說般嚴重, =X5w=(&
淺得用手指也可以磨平。 aN*{nW
明顯誇張。 '-N5F
H? z~V-8
筆尖: nu1XT 1q1
原裝是14K (也有18K的,出口法國) 而復刻版是18K的分別。 yevJA?C4 v
另外筆尖形狀和刻字也完全不同, d(^HO~p
復刻版看來要短和闊一點。 DMDtry?1:
g)$KN,gGuO
筆舌: /8l@ndZf
原裝是ebonite而復刻版是plastic的分別。 rA?<\*
原裝筆舌 (Pelikan 1929-1937年款式) 造型相當復雜, j[\:#/J
當然不會因為推出小量復刻版而重製, pi#a!Quf\
這點可以理解。 v,QvCozOz
"HqmS