筆夾: xn|(9#1o
原裝是engraved而復刻版是stamped的分別。 u>/ TE
原裝是雕刻的, \5cpFj5%
要「深」得多。 OK
gqT!
式樣而言, 76` .Y
倒是相同。 CVR3
A'
有老外筆評有以下「投訴」: !5?<% *
「The clip is engraved on the original pen. On this replica it is 'stamped.' This means that although the design is the same, the engraving has a much fainter appearance and seems out of balance with the rest of the pen. It is nowhere near as well done as the Toledo engraving and it is a shame that Pelikan decided to take this route. It almost feels like I could smooth off the engraving with my thumb. 」 C2)2)
竟使用了shame這個要很小心使用的字眼。 T9q-,w/j;
個人也對比過: 9]@!S|1
是比較「淺」了一點, P
L+sR3bR
但不是如他所說般嚴重, H7+,*
淺得用手指也可以磨平。 &
"B=/-(
明顯誇張。 7vj2
`+r.
dGTsc/$
筆尖: 5nVt[Puw
原裝是14K (也有18K的,出口法國) 而復刻版是18K的分別。 Ld-_,-n
另外筆尖形狀和刻字也完全不同, ]jRfH(i
復刻版看來要短和闊一點。 pFz`}?c0
!$>R j
筆舌: -n5)w*b,
原裝是ebonite而復刻版是plastic的分別。 RY*U"G0#w
原裝筆舌 (Pelikan 1929-1937年款式) 造型相當復雜, x3eZ^8^1}
當然不會因為推出小量復刻版而重製, cPc</[x[W
這點可以理解。 -1@<=jX3_
,wdD8ZT'Ip