筆夾: |A8Ar 7)
原裝是engraved而復刻版是stamped的分別。 g^NdN46%
原裝是雕刻的, _U1~^ucV
要「深」得多。 /R^HRzTO
式樣而言, 7ks09Cy
倒是相同。 #^gn,^QQ
有老外筆評有以下「投訴」: KZ6}),p
「The clip is engraved on the original pen. On this replica it is 'stamped.' This means that although the design is the same, the engraving has a much fainter appearance and seems out of balance with the rest of the pen. It is nowhere near as well done as the Toledo engraving and it is a shame that Pelikan decided to take this route. It almost feels like I could smooth off the engraving with my thumb. 」 -g]/Ko]2@$
竟使用了shame這個要很小心使用的字眼。 COOazXtW
個人也對比過: brb8C%j}9
是比較「淺」了一點, 4};!nYey!
但不是如他所說般嚴重, `.
/[/z-g
淺得用手指也可以磨平。 z_*]joL
明顯誇張。 'd]9u9u
= PqQJE}
筆尖: GIWgfE?
原裝是14K (也有18K的,出口法國) 而復刻版是18K的分別。 mq[(yR
另外筆尖形狀和刻字也完全不同, Y:^~KS=Uz
復刻版看來要短和闊一點。 LbJtU!
n4 KiC!*i0
筆舌: qDM/
6xO
原裝是ebonite而復刻版是plastic的分別。 "z69jxXo
原裝筆舌 (Pelikan 1929-1937年款式) 造型相當復雜, zG[fPD
當然不會因為推出小量復刻版而重製, f?dNTfQ3mi
這點可以理解。 r[eZV"
@\i6m]\X